The Budget Security Alternative to Intruder
Short version: Intruder is an excellent continuous vulnerability scanner that also sells AI-powered web app pentests from $3,500/test. If what you actually need is a manual penetration test with exploitation evidence an auditor will accept, that's a different product — and it's what we do: human-led testing by OSCP-certified professionals at $985 per tester-day (US), €849/day (EU). This page lays out the honest difference so you can pick right.
At a glance
| Intruder | Budget Security | |
|---|---|---|
| Core model | Continuous automated vulnerability scanning; AI web app pentests | Manual penetration testing by certified humans |
| Published price | AI pentest from $3,500/test (excl. VAT); subscription scanning tiers | $985 per tester-day (US) / €849/day (EU) |
| Best for | Ongoing hygiene and known-CVE detection across a changing surface | Audit evidence, business logic, complex auth, deep manual testing |
| Audit evidence (SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / NIS2) | AI/automated output — auditors expect manual evidence | Manual report with exploitation proof + tester identity |
| Report turnaround | Continuous / on scan completion | Full report within 7 days; findings as confirmed |
| Retest | Re-scan on schedule | One free retest included |
Intruder figures read from its public pricing page, August 2026. Some subscription tiers render dynamically and are not quoted here. See our Pentest Price Index for the sourcing.
Where each one wins
Choose Intruder when your priority is continuous, low-effort monitoring of a shifting external surface — catching new exposures and known CVEs quickly across many assets. That's a genuinely good use of an automated platform, and we won't pretend otherwise.
Choose Budget Security when you need a real penetration test: an auditor asked for one, a customer's security review demands manual evidence, or you're shipping a product where business logic and authentication flaws — the things scanners and AI agents miss — are the actual risk. You get a named OSCP-certified tester, exploitation evidence, and a report built for audits.
Honestly? Many teams run both. Continuous scanning for coverage, a manual pentest for depth and compliance. They solve different problems.